Driver Reviews
Reviews are submitted by individual users and reflect their personal opinions and experiences. Kolega does not verify, endorse, or take responsibility for the accuracy of user-generated content. If you believe a review violates our Terms of Service, you can flag it for review.
"Drivers exhibit unsafe behavior, frequently speeding and disregarding other drivers. There's a lack of support and willingness to assist colleagues both on the road and at work."
"The company has significantly reduced salaries, now offering just 70 euros. Drivers are expected to work 88 hours over 22 days, regardless of delays or traffic. There's a small bonus for experienced drivers and eco-friendly driving. The workload is unrealistic, and the promised salary is misleading. Drivers may face deductions for fuel and other fabricated fines. Numerous better-paying companies exist in Lithuania."
"This company has been a good place to work for nearly four years. They hire drivers with or without experience and appreciate hard work and a positive attitude. Salary is performance-based."
"After two years, this driver felt their time was wasted, citing deceptive practices and questionable management. Concerns were raised about the company's ownership and the behavior of some team members, leading to a negative experience with constant lies and alleged abuse, and low pay."
"Hoptrans pays on time, but payroll is confusing and inconsistent. Dispatchers push for maximized driving and working hours, and there's pressure to disregard regulations. The promised 8/4 schedule was actually a 12/5, with long periods in Western Europe and difficulty returning home. Rest periods are significantly reduced due to travel time. It's best suited for inexperienced drivers seeking CPC certification."
"Working here for three months was a negative experience. Pay calculations are confusing and deductions significantly reduce daily earnings. New hires may struggle with the initial assessment, and there's a questionable training program with a large fee. Promised routes of Italy, France, and Benelux often turn into unexpected and demanding trips to Scandinavia, Switzerland, and customs, all for a low daily rate. Communication is difficult, management is inconsistent, and the overall environment is frustrating. The company's future looks bleak with potential staff turnover."
"Many people have expressed concerns about the company's practices, and while responses are provided, there's little action taken, leading to high employee turnover."
"I've worked here for a year and am surprised by the negative reviews. My experience has been positive; our training group of ten thrived, and everyone is happy. I've witnessed issues with previous drivers, including one found intoxicated and neglecting truck maintenance. I'm satisfied with the job and salary and would recommend this company."
"This company is extremely problematic. They demand unrealistic performance while hauling heavy loads over mountainous terrain in Europe, then blame drivers when they can't meet those demands. There are concerns about unfair financial practices and a lack of consideration for drivers' well-being, suggesting a deeply flawed and potentially exploitative system."
"This company is unreliable and leaves drivers shorted on pay. Previous positive reviews are likely false. Many drivers have negative experiences they are hesitant to share, but the reviews reflect genuine concerns."
"The company used to be decent, but declined significantly over the last year. Management exploited drivers, making unfair deductions and prioritizing profit over employee well-being. It's difficult to resolve issues, and the company is not recommended, especially for inexperienced drivers."
"I'm confused by complaints about being charged for mistakes. In my five years with this company, pay has been standard, the trucks are excellent, and I've had a positive experience. The market for this company isn't strong, and drivers might be better off elsewhere."
"This company is generally positive. Payments are reliable, and the trucks are in decent condition. The reviewer has been employed for over a year."
"This company is accused of stealing drivers' money and is described as poorly managed. It's recommended to research the company thoroughly before joining."
"This company is not recommended. The reviewer experienced constant problems and felt pressured to overwork, leading to poor working conditions and financial burden. They worked for three months and have 14 years of trucking experience overall."
"I worked here since 2017 until recent changes to the work system and salaries made things unsustainable. Constant inquiries about payment, unclear explanations, and discrepancies regarding pay are common. The company has been caught violating hours-of-service regulations. Experienced drivers are leaving, and the company uses questionable schemes to deduct from driver earnings, including a fuel consumption program that unfairly penalizes drivers. There's a lack of transparency and clear answers when questioned about discrepancies."
"This company has mixed reviews. The trucks are generally well-maintained, and some managers are decent to work with. However, there are significant financial issues: unexplained fuel charges, questionable accounting practices leading to deductions, and difficulty proving discrepancies. Payment rates are low, and the promised salary is inaccurate. Driver turnover is high, and initial employment costs are excessive. Overall, it's recommended to seek employment elsewhere."
"I would not recommend this company. They are deceptive and dishonest, and their promises do not match reality."
"This driver criticizes the company's driving standards, comparing them unfavorably to Girteka. They also express frustration about payment issues, suggesting they weren't compensated for work performed."
"This company seems okay, especially considering it's relatively new. It's amusing to see varying opinions from similar online locations, but overall, people who started here don't seem to have many complaints."
"This company's facilities are incredibly basic and inadequate for its size, with a focus on cost-cutting that impacts driver well-being. Drivers should expect very limited personal care opportunities and potentially difficult living conditions while on the road. It's a harsh reality for those who work here."
"I've been with Hopik for four years and am looking forward to a company keychain upon my fifth anniversary."
"This company is extremely problematic. They impose numerous fines for various issues, including mileage, fuel, and maintenance. Payments are unreliable, and they exploit drivers' need for work permits to deduct pay arbitrarily. Drivers are pressured to violate driving hour regulations and often forced to sleep in unsafe locations due to a lack of parking. Routes primarily use national roads with limited parking options. Disputes are met with false explanations and require intervention from labor inspectors."
"The company's organization is problematic, and there's a lack of respect for employees. Payments are often delayed, requiring constant hard work. New hires are being given overly difficult assignments without sufficient experience."
"This company's practices are highly questionable. Drivers report significant pay deductions for various reasons, including fuel consumption, over-mileage, downtime, and even accidents, regardless of fault. Salary is significantly lower than advertised, and payslips are withheld. There are concerns about forced chip installation and potential legal issues in certain countries. The company appears focused on extracting money from drivers rather than providing fair compensation."
"New drivers can expect a strict schedule with limited flexibility, often involving overtime. The company prioritizes newer trucks but struggles with communication and driver support."
"Hoptrans provided new equipment and highway routes, which was initially appealing. However, unexpected deductions for trailer maintenance and mileage were concerning, though apparently common across trucking companies. Salary payments are inconsistent and unpredictable, and communication after payroll is difficult. While not the worst, drivers must carefully monitor company actions."
"The driver experienced significant payroll discrepancies and unexplained deductions. The accountant provided inconsistent information, and deductions for accidents and repairs were excessive and repeatedly applied. Pay was inconsistent, with deductions impacting earnings. Driver shortages led to a demanding work schedule. The company's practices felt unfair and not legally mandated."
"Despite claiming to require experience, many hired drivers lacked it. The company withholds necessary medical evaluations and psychological tests. They force drivers to sign multiple documents authorizing salary deductions and potential termination for absenteeism, presented only during training. Work hours can reach 95 hours, with significant pay discrepancies and delayed payments, often involving unfulfilled deductions. Salaries are paid every 26 days, making it one of the lowest-paying companies."
"The trucks are new, but pay is a major problem. After three months of work, the driver was wrongly accused of fuel theft and trailer damage, resulting in a significant deduction from their pay. Resolving the issue involved extensive negotiations and union intervention. Rest hours are not strictly adhered to, and there's a risk of wage withholding. Many drivers have experienced similar issues, making this company unreliable."
"The company adheres to hours of service regulations and pays β¬22 for materials. Travel time was excessively long (36 hours), followed by fluctuating rates: initially β¬70-75 per day, then a drop to β¬16 for two days, with an upfront registration fee of β¬120. Work cycles are 12 weeks long, with a maximum daily rate of β¬66. Routes primarily consist of national roads and village roads, requiring a DVR. Overall, this driver does not recommend the company."
"The company operates with a flexible work structure. After over a year and a half, I appreciate the respectful attitude towards drivers and overall, things are satisfactory."
"The company's management has significantly declined since Darius took over. New, inexperienced managers pressure drivers with unrealistic expectations, including double rates and schedule violations. Communication is poor, and resolving issues requires legal intervention. High turnover rates are a major concern, and the company engages in questionable practices like writing negative reviews about drivers. This company is only suitable for inexperienced drivers seeking initial experience before finding a more reputable employer."
"I've worked for this company for four weeks. The truck is handed over on the road. We left Lithuania in a bus on Friday after an hour and a half of briefing, arriving in Russia on Sunday after 2500 km, three hours in the morning, then we started working. The work is like any other job, sometimes they send you on roads to save on highways that are terrifying. In Italy, mountains and winding roads that a car wouldn't handle. From the company's loading point to the first highway parking lot, it was 120 km and took 4.15 hours. They promised one salary during hiring, but a week later, I received a text saying payment conditions were changing. Category A drivers will receive 60 euros, and Category B drivers 50 euros per day. There's no explanation as to which category you'll be in. It's set up to rip you off. I thought, I have to work, earn money. But I'm starting to doubt if I came to the right place. A week later, I received a text asking me to bring a friend with experience and get a 150 "
"The company is acceptable. My experience has varied depending on the route and dispatcher. Pay initially was $60, dropped to $50 during quarantine, and is now increasing. Best of luck to others!"
"This company hires drivers based on biometrics, even without a visa, which carries significant legal risks like fines and deportation. Drivers should be cautious and understand the potential consequences of working under these circumstances."
"Overall, my experience has been decent. The initial pay rate was misrepresented; they promised $60, but during quarantine, it was $50, though it has since been corrected. The work itself is demanding."
"Drivers have expressed concern about salary reductions during quarantine, leading some to consider alternative employment. The company appears to be recovering, but financial stability remains a point of concern."
"After four years, it became clear this company wasn't a good fit. I recently resigned, and several other employees are considering doing the same."
"I worked for this company for two years before transitioning to car transport. It's a decent option, particularly for those new to trucking in Europe. They offer good training and the opportunity to operate reliable equipment."
"Some drivers have positive long-term experiences, while others encounter issues like older equipment and negative feedback, suggesting inconsistent standards."
"This driver had a deeply negative experience. They were left stranded in France, facing potential deportation due to poor communication and logistical failures. The company's handling of their departure was disorganized, with reports discarded and a chaotic handover process. Despite eventual payment, the driver felt severely let down and will not return, expressing strong disapproval of the companyβs practices."
"The driver is demanding payment for three months of work, citing unexplained and excessive deductions from their salary. They express frustration and accuse the company of failing to fulfill its financial obligations."
"I've worked with Hoptrans for nearly a year and appreciate their adherence to legal work and rest regulations. They consistently deliver on their promises. I value the flexibility in scheduling, as they readily accommodate desired work durations, often adjusting schedules promptly, sometimes even a week ahead or later."
"This company has serious issues. They make false promises about salary and advances, and payments are unpredictable. Drivers face excessive fines and deductions, leading to significant financial losses. Dispatchers are poorly treated, and employee turnover is extremely high. Former employees report a decline in pay and overall company integrity. It's generally considered a scam and not recommended."
"The reviewer emphasizes consistent salary payments, explaining a new reporting system for disbursement. Advances are available and based on performance. Manager changes are possible based on work quality. Long-term employees left with full payment after performing well. The reviewer has personally been paid as promised and acknowledges changes in conditions but remains satisfied."
"Having worked here for several years, the company has seen changes, but experienced employees generally manage their time and workload effectively. Issues are common across trucking companies, and Hoptrans maintains a work and rest schedule."
"The company promises one salary but often fails to pay it. New drivers are charged excessive fees for fuel and supplies, and are unfairly responsible for mechanical issues. Work conditions are difficult, with limited access to food and long hours spent waiting. Management receives bonuses while drivers are blamed for problems, and drivers often receive fraudulent paychecks."
"This company has a reputation for misleading drivers and causing financial harm. Many experienced professionals have had negative experiences, and it's strongly advised against joining."
"This company is dishonest and delays payments, which keeps drivers financially dependent. It's not a trustworthy place to work."
"The company's payment practices are disorganized and unreliable, with travel allowances and salaries not consistently paid on time. There's a perceived external control over payments, potentially involving a union. The company's financial practices are described as deceptive and exploitative, akin to financial terrorism."
"This company is not recommended for drivers of any experience level. There are reports of blackmail, threats, and unfair deductions for fuel, speeding, and work/rest violations. Parking is difficult, and replacements are problematic. Drivers are advised to seek alternative employment."
"Several drivers have expressed concerns about the current management, confirming reports of deceptive practices. My interactions with employees reinforced these negative opinions, leading me to believe Hoptrans is not a reliable employer. I advise caution and thorough investigation before engaging with their HR department."
"The company's quality has significantly declined. There are constant, unexplained deductions from pay, including excessive fees for registration, parking, and a long-term fund. The financial practices are deceptive and unsustainable. I will not be continuing my employment here."
"The reviewer and a group of twelve drivers experienced low earnings despite high mileage. They were assigned unfamiliar routes and had significant downtime on weekends. While they received pay for downtime, the overall earnings were low, approximately β¬2000 for a month and four days of work covering 13,500 km. The reviewer is willing to share contact information for current drivers."
"This company is exploitative, prioritizing profits over driver well-being. They lure in inexperienced drivers with promises of high pay, then exploit them. Experienced drivers are also undervalued. Turnover is high, and the company actively recruits from driving schools to maximize profits. They appear to manipulate mileage and fuel deductions, and the management dismisses dissatisfied employees. The company struggles to retain drivers despite acquiring new trucks."
"After reading reviews, I'm hesitant to join this company. My experience in Europe led me to believe I'd seen the worst, but the reviews suggest Hoptrans isn't much better."
"The company's practices are questionable and lack transparency regarding fines. They dispute financial responsibilities and attempt to shift blame. Salary deductions are frequently missed, and employees are treated poorly. Communication with dispatchers is also a significant issue due to language barriers."
"I've had a positive experience with this company over three terms. While it was challenging initially due to unfamiliarity with EU regulations, things are now running smoothly. I would recommend giving it a try and visiting in person to get a better feel for the operation."
"I understand your frustration. It seems you invested time and money and are now struggling to recover your losses, feeling forced to accept low pay just to break even."
"I regret working for this company. Management has become very greedy and dishonest since Remigius left. The current director, Darius, is far less approachable and has damaged the company's reputation. I strongly advise against seeking employment here."
"The experience was unremarkable; it served as a stepping stone to a better company. The driver felt undervalued and treated as cheap labor, with some recent issues involving colleagues from Lithuania and Poland. The current employer, though not ideal, is preferable to previous experiences in Poland and the Baltic states."
"I worked here for a year and a half, and initially, everything was satisfactory with timely payments. However, recent changes in pay rates for drivers with less than two years of experience have led me to seek other opportunities. They are currently hiring at lower rates."
"Drivers complaining about payment issues should understand that documents are legally binding and failure to follow procedures results in withheld pay. The company provides training without charge, unlike competitors, and experienced drivers have been with the company for years. Those who complain are often inexperienced and quickly leave."
"Management reduced salaries to 1290, implemented monthly fees (30e for a fund, 15e for registration), and deducted 400e to incentivize drivers' return to work. The driver perceives this as a significant decline in the company's operations."
"This company is terrible. They illegally withheld wages, deducted money for exceeding fuel limits, and charge excessive fees for parking, registration, and fuel. The pay is extremely low, and promises of raises feel deceptive. The company's practices are worse than notorious companies like Hegelman and Transtira."
"This company appears to exploit drivers, frequently replacing them to maximize profit. Drivers report withheld earnings and unfair deductions. The company's practices are considered deceptive and unethical, leaving drivers feeling exploited and struggling financially."
"I've been with the company for a year and a half and am satisfied with my experience. Payments are accurate and punctual, and the company shows continuous improvement. I would recommend it."
"This company is dishonest and will defend its drivers regardless of their actions, pressuring them to report a false positive experience. In reality, it's a terrible place to work."
"This company is a good place to work. I've been with them for a year and the pay is average. Dispatchers have a positive attitude, and there are no unexpected fees if drivers perform well. Overall, I would recommend this company."
"I worked for this company for over a year and ultimately left."
"The company advertises free positions and housing, but then deducts money from salaries and daily rates. Recruitment is excessive, leading to long delays before assignments. Drivers must confirm arrival or face costly hotel expenses. The company retains a significant portion of fines and often withholds pay. Promises are misleading and reality is deceptive."
"I share the same opinion regarding the management and workload."
"The management structure is problematic; a senior manager mandated that drivers be fully compensated, with managers facing penalties for not ensuring this. This suggests a lack of transparency and potential manipulation of driver pay."
"Drivers feel undervalued and treated poorly. Pay is unreliable, and the company shows a lack of respect for its employees."
"Avoid this company. It's highly problematic and unreliable."
"Having worked there for two years, I found the management generally cooperative. Salary delays were occasionally handled by providing a partial advance, which was appreciated. While I had some issues, I understood the company couldn't cover all my expenses. An accident repair cost significantly more than expected. The attitude towards drivers was somewhat lenient, potentially leading to equipment damage. Ultimately, itβs a sentiment that many experience β things are better elsewhere."
"The company provides training and skills development, though initial pay during training is low. There are issues with some drivers' behavior, including excessive drinking and poor hygiene. Dispatchers sometimes face unwarranted abuse. However, the reviewer receives timely pay, has good communication with management, and finds the company generally acceptable if one takes their work seriously."
"The company's approach is unprofessional."